AGSA flags procurement failures, weak financial controls at City of Johannesburg

By Akani Nkuna

The Auditor-General of South Africa (AGSA) has flagged procurement failures at the City of Johannesburg (CoJ), saying appointment processes for service providers are largely uncompetitive and unfair, while poor record-keeping and governance weaknesses continue to undermine accountability and service delivery.

Briefing the Standing Committee on Public Accounts (SCOPA), AGSA official Fhumulani Rabonda said most municipal projects were characterised by unjustified deviations linked to poor planning, which proved costly and highlighted systemic procurement failures.

“[Disciplinary boards] have not been effective in ensuring that they are up to date with all investigations and disciplinary cases. This is due to slow response from management, slow submission of information and the backlog they need to deal with,” he said on Tuesday.

“The key area resulting in procurement failures has to do with the processes themselves. The processes we embark on to appoint service providers have been found to be uncompetitive and unfair.”

AGSA also raised concerns over weak financial discipline at CoJ, including inadequate revenue collection, which resulted in nearly R4 billion in lost electricity revenue. Water revenue losses due to leaks amounted to about R2 billion, while illegal connections accounted for a further R790 million.

Rabonda said the municipality also faces challenges of “cut-off expenditure”, where transactions are recorded in the wrong financial year. He warned that the practice undermines accountability and contributes to irregular expenditure.

“It speaks to a lack of financial discipline in terms of daily and monthly reconciliations to ensure expenditure relating to a particular financial year has been fully and accurately reported,” he said.

He added that the city is operating on an unfunded budget, driven by “unrealistic revenue targets”, resulting in unauthorised expenditure linked to overspending on unfunded items.

The CoJ has also allocated a “significantly low” 4% of its budget to maintenance, compared with